Thursday, March 31, 2011

Patent Assistance Worldwide Takes A Look At The Development of the Telephone: Antonio Meucci vs Alexander Graham Bell

In excess of 130 years folks have been writing about, debating and all out fighting with reference to just who created the telephone. Certainly you can find numerous contenders, but nevertheless, it always has a tendency to come down to a final two. The first, Alexander Graham Bell, over the years is ordinarily attributed with creating the telephone. The second is Antonio Meucci, established in Italian and Italian American groups as the true developer of the telephone, or ‘teletrofono’ as he called it.

Alexander Graham Bell was born in Edinburgh, Scotland; his family business enterprise was speech and elocution with both his father and grandfather being widely renowned in the field. Bell followed in their footsteps and went about researching the approaches of speech. He inevitably transferred into the particular field of visual speech, which was developed by his father. Bell went to England, Canada and in due course ended up in the Boston area, educating educators on how to teach the deaf to communicate. By the time his telephone invention was taking shape he was a well known mentor at Boston University in the vocal physiology division.

Antonio Meucci was born near Florence, Italy and early on trained in chemical and mechanical engineering, although he terminated his specialized training around the age of 15/16 given that he could no longer afford it. Meucci’s preliminary professional work experience is comprised of employment for the Florentine administration and then converting into a stage technician in Florence. He then moved to Havana, Cuba with his wife who was a costume designer and he was employed to work in the same theater as she. It is expressed that while employed at this theater, Meucci put together a first example of his creation to converse between the stage and control room. Meucci immigrated to Staten Island, New York in 1850. A pattern of unfortunate incidents affected Meucci; his wife was bedridden with a type of rheumatoid arthritis, and he went bankrupt in the early 1860’s. While he obtained a patent caveat for his teletrofono in 1871, which was parallel to what Bell subsequently patented, Meucci never finalized his patent, and consequently either decided to stop paying for the yearly renewal or was financially unable.

The United States Patent Office archives reveal that Bell requested and was allocated his patent in 1874. The controversy is persistent that had Meucci been better financed he would be accepted as the founder of the telephone. While Bell encountered over 600 lawsuits from various other designers claiming to have been the actual inventiveness pertaining to the invention of the telephone, he never lost a legal proceeding.

Congress formulated a determination in 2002 stating that "Antonio Meucci was a man of vision whose enormous talents led to the invention of the telephone. Meucci began work on his invention in the mid-1880s, refining and perfecting the telephone during his many years living on Staten Island." Although this proclamation does in fact lend credit to Meucci’s effort and skills, it is worded so that he is primarily allocated credit for leading to the invention and not for the invention. This has often times been misinterpreted. As a consequence, to this day, Alexander Graham Bell stands as the ‘inventor’ of the telephone, with United States Patent No. 174,465 to back up his claims.

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Patent Assistance Worldwide Making the Most of the Patent Process

Patent Assistance Worldwide
Maybe you have wondered what exactly the term ‘patent pending’ denotes. It looks like you notice it everywhere we look. Evening infomercials are chock-full of patent pending policies. I was intrigued and needed to know what exactly is meant by the words ‘Patent Pending’. You’re in luck, as I am actually going to share the search results of my thorough quest for information. Thank Heavens for Internet search engines.
In the beginning, you should know that exploring the United States Patent and Trademark Office internet page is about as beneficial as browsing just about any Department of Motor Vehicles website. If you’re unfamiliar with either, count yourself lucky. An immediate visit to the website index features numerous pages that read like law school text books. And once you get within the specific pages, supposedly, the site designer thought that visual flow charts brimming with text would be easy to discover. It wasn’t quite so easy. I promptly figured out that it could take me far more time to obtain a response on the official site than it would to set up a seven-course dinner for fifty people.

After jumping through the information upon the first page of search results, the answer was surprisingly crystal clear. The terminology ‘Patent Pending’ entails not much more than the owner of the thing; concept or even plant (yes you can patent plants) has applied for a patent from the US Patent and Trademark Office. I applaud them for realizing the easiest way to go about the request processes as it is no basic endeavor. Seemingly fake claims to ‘Patent Pending’ position are prohibited. As stated by the USPTO website, the current average patent application methods takes somewhere around two and a half years from the time you document your preliminary patent form to the moment in time your patent is technically processed. When this occurs, you could make the announcement, I have a ‘patent pending’. If you make it through to the end of the rainbow and find a pot of gold, you will be able to assert the Patent and fill out the particular number assigned to your product or service, layout or plants.

And after taking enough time looking through the mountain of written text, recommendations, strictures and constraints, it becomes a lot more crystal clear why people need take advantage of assistance like Patent Assistance Worldwide to help them find their way around the patent progression. There really is a literal forest of certification that needs to be filed not to mention blueprints, legal records and extensive searches for matching established patents. Dependent on precisely how you value your efforts you could find that having the services of a trained professional could save you money and time in the end. Having a professional ally will enable you to stay ahead of the requirements and prevent the drawbacks common to the method which can keep you from throwing in the towel with stress.